<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back to SEO Basics &#8211; from Site Review Session at Google I/O 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-scientist.com/seo-basics-site-review-session-at-google-io-2009.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-scientist.com/seo-basics-site-review-session-at-google-io-2009.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 09:31:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: agroup</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scientist.com/seo-basics-site-review-session-at-google-io-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-31511</link>
		<dc:creator>agroup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 12:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scientist.com/?p=56#comment-31511</guid>
		<description>Very interesting indeed. I will take everything matt is saying with a grain of salt; he obviously knows more about the Google algorithm than any of us, but I have found at least one fact written on his blog which has proven as incorrect according to my tests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting indeed. I will take everything matt is saying with a grain of salt; he obviously knows more about the Google algorithm than any of us, but I have found at least one fact written on his blog which has proven as incorrect according to my tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neyne</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scientist.com/seo-basics-site-review-session-at-google-io-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-30823</link>
		<dc:creator>Neyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scientist.com/?p=56#comment-30823</guid>
		<description>@annkur speculations are not a bad thing. Google keeps things in the dark intentionally and it is not always clear to what use they put all their abilities. OnlyGizmos article (and all the others i linked to) shows that Google does OCR, however it is not clear whether they use it to index and rank images in the Google images SERPs. Matt says they don&#039;t. That is all i wrote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@annkur speculations are not a bad thing. Google keeps things in the dark intentionally and it is not always clear to what use they put all their abilities. OnlyGizmos article (and all the others i linked to) shows that Google does OCR, however it is not clear whether they use it to index and rank images in the Google images SERPs. Matt says they don&#8217;t. That is all i wrote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scientist.com/seo-basics-site-review-session-at-google-io-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-30822</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scientist.com/?p=56#comment-30822</guid>
		<description>I wanted a free Android phone :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted a free Android phone <img src='http://www.seo-scientist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annkur</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scientist.com/seo-basics-site-review-session-at-google-io-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-30821</link>
		<dc:creator>Annkur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scientist.com/?p=56#comment-30821</guid>
		<description>You have linked to a post from OnlyGizmos as speculation. I just want to clarify that the article actually shows how you can use Google to read the text in editable format from scanned documents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have linked to a post from OnlyGizmos as speculation. I just want to clarify that the article actually shows how you can use Google to read the text in editable format from scanned documents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
